Link and intent signals
Checks can look for suspicious URL structure, brand-domain mismatch, urgency, OTP/UPI pressure, fake authority, and other common scam patterns.
VerifyPulse helps people and teams assess suspicious links and messages. It provides risk evidence and safer next steps; it does not guarantee that every item is safe or harmful.
For submitted text and links, the live service combines deterministic signals with enrichment and, when available, AI-assisted analysis. The exact signals used depend on the input and service availability.
Checks can look for suspicious URL structure, brand-domain mismatch, urgency, OTP/UPI pressure, fake authority, and other common scam patterns.
Known URL/domain evidence is checked against the available historical reputation index and published threat-intelligence enrichment before live AI analysis is needed.
When an external analysis provider is unavailable, VerifyPulse does not treat the lack of analysis as proof that content is safe.
Please do not submit OTPs, PINs, passwords, card details, bank-account credentials, or other unnecessary sensitive information. Use an official bank or service channel for account-specific issues.
The public verification route applies supported-type and input-size checks. External file analysis requires an explicit consent signal before it begins.
The current B2B scan route emits structured operational events that exclude raw scan content, URLs, API keys, IP addresses, contact data, credentials, and personal identifiers.
The B2B URL-scan route includes API-key authentication, scope checks, browser-origin allow-listing, correlation IDs, and basic request-rate controls.
These controls are not an external security certification. Prospective business customers should perform their own review before processing customer information.
Where available, results explain the decision basis—for example, historical reputation evidence, URL/intent signals, model-assisted analysis, or service status.
If the service cannot complete live analysis and there is no strong local evidence, the result should recommend independent verification rather than saying SAFE.
Critical implementation and data files are checked against an integrity manifest to help detect unreviewed changes in the maintained repository.
VerifyPulse does not currently replace a bank’s fraud engine, transaction controls, device intelligence, human investigation process, or final payment decision.
For a controlled business-pilot discussion, review the Pilot page. For a security concern or correction to this page, contact narayanglokhande2007@gmail.com. Responsible disclosure details are also published at /.well-known/security.txt.